Legal Opinion

United States v. Samuel Rizzo De Cavalcante

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 10, 1971No. 71-1586_1PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order, entered after a full hearing, that denied appellant’s motion, filed before sentence, to withdraw his plea of guilty.

On January 2, 1970, appellant had pleaded not guilty to a charge of conspiring to commit a federal offense through inter-state telephoning in furtherance of an unlawful gambling business. On December 15, 1970, after the completion of pretrial procedures, the district court set February 2, 1971 as the peremptory date for trial. On January 15, 1971, at his own request and after a hearing, appellant was permitted to withdraw that…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. John Stayton and Rita Stayton, John StaytonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  2. United States v. De CavalcanteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971

4Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. Bernard Jerry, and Edgar SaundersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. John D. Crowley A/K/A Jack CrowleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. David L. NahodilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Don BerryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  5. Simone and Mary De Cavalcante, Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API