Legal Opinion

Ingram v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 4, 1919No. 10730Published

Accusation of sale of intoxicating liquor; from city court of Carrollton—Judge Beall. June 23, 1919.

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. (a) “A ground of a motion for a new trial which complains of the admission of specified testimony must state the name of the witness whose testimony is complained of.” Adams v. State, 22 Ga. App. 252 (95 S. E. 877), and cases cited.(5) “Under repeated rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court, a ground of a motion for a new trial must be complete in itself. When it is so incomplete as to require this court to refer to the pleadings or to the brief of evidence, it will not be considered.” Cæsar v. State, 22 Ga. App. 796 (97 S. E. 255), and cases cited.(c) “It is only where a case is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Adams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  2. Cæsar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  3. Williamson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API