Legal Opinion

Hudson v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 2008No. 100466Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

889 N.E.2d 210 (2007)

228 Ill.2d 462

George HUDSON, Sr., Indiv. and on Behalf of the Estate of George Hudson, Jr., Deceased, et al., Appellants,

v.

The CITY OF CHICAGO et al., Appellees.

No. 100466.

Supreme Court of Illinois.

January 25, 2008.

Dissenting Opinion Upon Denial of Rehearing April 23, 2008.

Roy P. Amatore, Paul Luka, James H. Porn, Chicago (Richard A. Michael, of counsel), for appellants.

Mara S. Georges, Corporation Counsel, Chicago (Benna Ruth Solomon, Myriam Zreczny Kasper, Kerrie Maloney Laytin, of counsel), for appellees.

James P. Costello, of Costello, McMahon & Burke, Ltd., Chicago,…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Thomas; Dissent · Kilbride; Dissent · Kilbride.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Best v. Taylor MacHine WorksIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  3. River Park, Inc. v. City of Highland ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Rein v. David A. Noyes & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Nowak v. St. Rita High SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 2001

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API