Dickerson v. Stalder
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PORTEOUS, District Judge.
The Court has considered the complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and plaintiffs written objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff Marcus Dickerson has not presented any arguments in his objections that were not already considered by the Magistrate Judge in his Report and Recommendation.
However, the Court will specifically address plaintiffs objections. Concerning the applicability of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (hereinafter…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Harris v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Aaron Lindh v. James P. Murphy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Texaco, Inc. v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Michael Dwayne Brown v. Ronald Angelone, Jesse James Pritchard, Jr. v. Ronald Angelone, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- State v. HebertLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Galindo v. JohnsonDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1998