Anzalone v. Vormack
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
POPOVICH, Judge:
The defendant/appellant, Michael Vor-mack, appeals the order dismissing his writ of certiorari for lack of a sufficient record. We affirm.
In reviewing a denial of a writ of certiorari, we may only examine the record to determine if the court had jurisdiction and the proceedings were regular. Commonwealth v. Dortort, 205 Pa.Super. 211, 208 A.2d 797, 800 (1965); Commonwealth v. Meches, 144 Pa.Super. 381, 19 A.2d 555, 556 (1941). An examination of the record certified to this Court reveals that on February 12, 1996, the plaintiff, Christine Anzalone, filed a civil complaint…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hollinger v. HollingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Schwarz v. SchwarzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. LantzySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- American Express Co. v. BurgisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Frycklund v. WaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Grady, F. v. Nelson, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Montgomery County Tax Claim Bureau v. QueenanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Penn National a/s/o Shenberger, D. v. Phillips, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Sharp, C. v. McQuiller, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Grady, F. v. Nelson, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.