Goldstein v. Barbone

—In a professional malpractice action to recover damages from defendants, an architect and an engineer, plaintiffs appeal from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Buell, J.), dated July 6, 1984, as, upon granting plaintiffs’ motion for a default judgment against defendant Barbone, directed that the assessment of damages against said defendant follow the trial against codefendant Zimmerman, and (2) a further order of the same court (Weiner, J.), dated December 6, 1984, which, inter alia, granted Barbone’s motion to vacate his default.

Order dated December 6, 1984…