In re the Claim of Sepe

Appellant has appealed from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, which affirmed a referee’s decision holding that, while claimant performed services as a typist in her home for appellant, she was an employee of the latter, and entitled to be credited with her earnings during 1950 as a basis for unemployment insurance benefits.

The facts are not in dispute. Appellant is in the direct mail business, engaging people to do home typing. In May, 1950, claimant, answering appellant’s newspaper advertisement for home typists, was interviewed by appellant. At that time claimant…