Legal Opinion
Schilb v. Duke Manufacturing Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided April 5, 2011No. WD 72637PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS H. NEWTON, Judge.
Mr. Michael Schilb appeals the denial of his application for unemployment benefits. The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) determined that Mr. Schilb was not entitled to benefits because he was discharged for misconduct connected with work. The Commission determined that he was discharged for misconduct connected with work because Mr. Schilb was negligent on the job twice within four months. We reverse.
Factual and Procedural Background
Mr. Schilb worked as a warehouse lead for Duke Manufacturing Company (Duke). His employment with Duke began on…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hoover v. Community Blood CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Dixon v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Johnson v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Finner v. Americold Logistics, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Frisella v. Deuster Electric, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Anderson Living Trust v. WPX Energy Production, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Ashford v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Mooneyham v. Barnz B, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Rose Speed v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015