Gunderson v. Village of Hinsdale
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nash
Defendant, village of Hinsdale (village), appeals from a judgment of the circuit court which found that the village’s zoning ordinance was arbitrary and unreasonable as applied to the real estate owned by plaintiffs, Arthur N. Gunderson and Richard A. Chatfield. The village contends that the judgment of the trial court was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence. We agree and reverse.
In 1965, plaintiffs purchased 1.08 acres at the southeast corner of Washington Street and Ogden Avenue in Hinsdale for $35,500. At that time, the property was zoned “A” for single-family use and divided…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- La Salle National Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
- Sinclair Pipe Line Co. v. Village of Richton ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- La Salle National Bank v. City of EvanstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
- Cosmopolitan National Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- Drogos v. Village of BensenvilleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Glenview State Bank v. Village of DeerfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Northern Trust Bank/Lake Forest v. County of LakeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Oliver Construction Co. v. Village of Villa ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Palatine National Bank v. Village of BarringtonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Northern Trust Bank v. County of LakeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000