Legal Opinion

State v. Herro

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1971No. State 41PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

The only issue on this appeal is whether the withdrawal of appellant’s guilty plea is necessary to correct a manifest injustice within the meaning of State v. Reppin. Appellant advances this argument in three ways:

1. The circumstances surrounding the plea were such as to render it involuntary.

2. Appellant was motivated to enter her guilty plea by her desire to avoid the possibility of life imprisonment and therefore her plea to the lesser offense was a manifest injustice.

3. The fact that appellant does not admit the crime invalidates the guilty plea.

Circumstances surrounding the plea.

There is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. State v. ReppinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Ernst v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State v. CarterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gibson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Jones v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. Terrance J.W.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  4. Bosket v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Bergenthal v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API