Legal Opinion
State v. Leutwyler
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided November 5, 1998No. 03-97-00513-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEA ANN SMITH, Justice.
To address certain concerns raised in the unopposed motion for rehearing, we withdraw our earlier opinion and judgment issued October 8,1998, and substitute this one in its place.
The State of Texas brought an action in district court to enforce a final order rendered by the Railroad Commission that ordered Eurampex Industries, Inc., d/b/a Associated Operating & Exploration (Eurampex), to plug inactive wells, to reimburse the Railroad Commission for plugging costs and to pay an administrative penalty. The State, in its district court action, also sought to recover from…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Barr v. Resolution Trust Corp. Ex Rel. Sunbelt Federal SavingsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Sysco Food Services, Inc. v. TrapnellTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Muckelroy v. Richardson Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
- Jonnet v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Zuniga v. Wooster Ladder Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2003
- Phillip Archer A/K/A Philip Archer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
- W. SCOTT McCOLLOUGH AND DAVID BOLDUC v. Texas Public Utility Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
- Zuniga v. Wooster Ladder Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2003