Legal Opinion

AKHTAR v. CHEN

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided February 27, 2023No. 3:21-cv-00658Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NAEEM AKHTAR, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:21-cv-00658 YA-MEI CHEN, et al OPINION Defendants. CASTNER, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court upon the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Ya-Mei Chen (“Chen”), Mark Koumans (“Koumans”), and Chad F. Wolf (“Wolf”) (collectively, “Defendants”) against Plaintiff Naeem Akhtar (“Akhtar” or “Plaintiff”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. (ECF No. 17.) The Court has carefully considered the parties’ submissions and decides the motions without…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Fedorenko v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. MEYER, Joseph W., Appellant v. RIEGEL PRODUCTS CORPORATION and James River Corporation of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API