Commonwealth v. Childress
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtBowes, J.
¶ 1 Raymond Childress appeals from the December 18, 2000 order denying him post-conviction relief. Appellant contends that prior counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to pursue: 1) the suppression of the Commonwealth witnesses’ testimony on grounds that the Commonwealth obtained that testimony in violation of 18 Pa.C.S. § 4952(a)(2), Pa. Rule Professional Conduct 3.4(b), and 18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(2); and 2) the dismissal of these charges on the basis that Appellant was selectively prosecuted. We find that prior counsel’s representation was not deficient, and we affirm.
¶ 2 On…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States v. Sonya Evette SingletonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. StetlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Com. v. Campbell, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Com. v. Jones, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Com. v. Moss, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Com. v. Nicholson, M., Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.