Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Childress

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 16, 2002PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBowes, J.

¶ 1 Raymond Childress appeals from the December 18, 2000 order denying him post-conviction relief. Appellant contends that prior counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to pursue: 1) the suppression of the Commonwealth witnesses’ testimony on grounds that the Commonwealth obtained that testimony in violation of 18 Pa.C.S. § 4952(a)(2), Pa. Rule Professional Conduct 3.4(b), and 18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(2); and 2) the dismissal of these charges on the basis that Appellant was selectively prosecuted. We find that prior counsel’s representation was not deficient, and we affirm.

¶ 2 On…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. United States v. Sonya Evette SingletonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StetlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Com. v. Campbell, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Com. v. Jones, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Com. v. Moss, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Com. v. Nicholson, M., Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API