Legal Opinion

People v. Poslof

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 28, 2005No. E033503PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GAUT, J.

1. Introduction

Defendant Lonnie Lee Poslof appeals his jury conviction for failing to register as a sex offender in Twentynine Palms, in violation of Penal Code section 290, subdivision (g)(2). In a bifurcated trial, the jury also found true allegations that defendant had two prior convictions for lewd and lascivious acts upon a child, 2 which qualified as serious or violent felonies, 3 and had served two prior prison terms and failed to remain free of prison custody for five years. 4 The trial court sentenced defendant to a total term of 27 years to life in state prison.

Defenda…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. TOBAR-LOBOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2007
  2. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Delgado v. YatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
  5. In re Poslof CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API