Legal Opinion

Florida Department of Revenue v. Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 16, 2008No. 07-312PublishedCited by 269 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

The Bankruptcy Code provides a stamp-tax exemption for any asset transfer “under a plan confirmed under [Chapter 11]” of the Code. 11 U. S. C. § 1146(a) (2000 ed., Supp. V). Respondent Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc., was granted an exemption for assets transferred after it had filed for bankruptcy but before its Chapter 11 plan was submitted to, and confirmed by, the Bankruptcy Court. Petitioner, the Florida Department of Revenue, seeks reversal of the decision of *36the Court of Appeals upholding the exemption for Piccadilly’s asset transfer. Because we hold that § 1146(a)’s stamp-tax exemption…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. YeskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by269 opinions

  1. Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Kucana v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. 14 Penn Plaza LLC v. PyettSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund v. Goldfarb Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

264 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API