Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Low

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of California

Decided October 15, 1872Published

[This was an action by Daniel Palmer against Joseph W. Low and others.]

1Opinion of the Court

SAWYEE, Circuit Judge.

Loring and Jones entered upon one hundred vara lot, No: 39, in the city of San Francisco, embracing the ■ premises in question, in the year 1S51, or 1852, inclosed it, and built a house thereon. The plaintiff deraigns title from them. Plaintiff and his grantors were in the adverse possession of the premises from the entry of Loring and Jones at the date mentioned till ejected by defendants May 8, 1867, under a writ of possession issued in the case of Donner v. Palmer [45 Cal. 180], to which suit neither the plaintiff nor either of his grantors, was a party. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Collection Bureau of San Jose v. RumseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Arrington v. LiscomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Cannon v. StockmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Palmer v. LowSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Jackson v. LodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API