Legal Opinion

United States v. Oestmann

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided April 29, 2004No. NMCCA 200301443PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Judge:

A military judge, sitting alone as a general court-martial, convicted the appellant, pursu*662ant to his pleas, of: conspiracy to wrongfully possess hashish with the intent to distribute; without authority, failing to go to his appointed place of duty to provide a urine sample; violating a lawful general order by wrongfully possessing illegal drug paraphernalia (hashish pipe); wrongfully possessing 27 grams of hashish with the intent to distribute; on divers occasions, wrongfully using hashish; and, wrongfully possessing 6 grams of marijuana. The appellant’s crimes violated Articles…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  4. United States v. TardifCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  5. United States v. Walter Swiderski and Maritza De Los SantosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. OestmannCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  2. United States v. OestmannCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API