United States v. Oestmann
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, Judge:
A military judge, sitting alone as a general court-martial, convicted the appellant, pursu*662ant to his pleas, of: conspiracy to wrongfully possess hashish with the intent to distribute; without authority, failing to go to his appointed place of duty to provide a urine sample; violating a lawful general order by wrongfully possessing illegal drug paraphernalia (hashish pipe); wrongfully possessing 27 grams of hashish with the intent to distribute; on divers occasions, wrongfully using hashish; and, wrongfully possessing 6 grams of marijuana. The appellant’s crimes violated Articles…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. TardifCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
- United States v. Walter Swiderski and Maritza De Los SantosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. OestmannCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
- United States v. OestmannCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005