Legal Opinion

Thomas & Betts Co. v. Electrical Fittings Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 22, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULBERT, District Judge.

There will be a decree:

1. Sustaining the validity of claim No. 1, and

2. Holding invalid claim' Nb. 2 of Letters Patent No. 1,769,947, and

3. Dismissing the Bill (a) as to contributory infringement, (b) for an injunction, and (c) for an accounting.

The Thomas & Betts Company of Elizabeth, New Jersey, and the National Electric Products Corp., of Pittsburgh, Pa., are New Jersey and Delaware corporations, respectively.

Electrical Fittings Corporation and Joselson Sales Corporation are New York corporations, each having its principal office at 27 Warren Street, New York, N.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bassick Mfg. Co. v. RM Hollingshead Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Bassick Manufacturing Co. v. R. M. Hollingshead Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. National Electric Products Corp. v. Circle Flexible Conduit Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Electrical Fittings Corp. v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Hazeltine Corp. v. Crosley Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  3. Thomas & Betts Co. v. Steel City Electric Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Thomas & Betts Co. v. Electrical Fittings Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API