Legal Opinion

County of Hennepin v. Bell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 29, 1890PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Case certified from the district court for Hennepin county, by Hooker, J., in proceedings to enforce payment of delinquent real-estate taxes.

1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.

Prior to the levy of the taxes in dispute here upon the property described in the record, the present owners, Bell and Maloney,-had become the owners thereof by purchase, and had leased the same to the trustees of an institution of learning known as “Bennett Seminary,” at a stipulated annual rental, and the premises were occupied by the seminary during the year for which such taxes are sought to be enforced. Bell and Maloney claim that the property is exempt from taxation because of such occupancy of the premises by the seminary, under Gen. St. 1878, c. 11, § 5, which provides that “all…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Washburn College v. Comm'rs of Shawnee Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  2. Black v. City of BrooklynNew York Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Camping and Education Foundation v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. State v. Carleton CollegeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  3. State v. Bishop Seabury MissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  4. Benton County v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  5. County of Ramsey v. Church of the Good ShepherdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API