Legal Opinion

State v. Wilcox

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 1983No. 83-CA-21PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMilligan, J.

Defendant-appellant, Daniel L. Wilcox, was convicted of driving while intoxicated pursuant to R.C. 4511.19(A)(3). This recent amendment prohibits operation of a motor vehicle with a breath alcohol concentration at or in excess of ten-hundredths of one gram by weight of alcohol per two hundred ten liters of breath.

Appellant moved to dismiss the complaint on April 4, 1983. Following a hearing, the Delaware Municipal Court overruled the motion. Appellant entered a plea of no contest and was found guilty by the trial court.

Appellant assigns two errors:

Assignment of Error No. I

“The trial court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. FrancoWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. MurphyGirard Municipal Court · 1983

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BraymanWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. MendietaOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. McKeehan v. American Family Life Assurance Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. State v. PorterOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Fazio v. Coupe (In Re Coupe)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API