Ivanhoe v. Ivanhoe
Oregon Supreme Court
From Union: Gustav Anderson, Judge. Statement by Mr. Justice Burnett. This is a suit by S. E. Ivanboe, a wife, to compel F. S. Ivanboe, her husband, to contribute to her support. From a decree making an allowance to the plaintiff much less than she claimed, both parties have appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett
Section 7040, L. O. L., says that: “It shall be lawful for any married woman to apply to the Circuit Court of the county in which she resides for an order upon her husband to provide for her support and the support of her minor children, if any, by said husband living with her.” By the next section the court is *298empowered to hear the parties, and, if the husband is found to be remiss in his duty to support his wife, to make such a decree enforcing his matrimonial obligation in that respect ‘ ‘ as shall be equitable in view of the circumstances of both parties.” Section 7042 says: “The practice…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fowler FowlerOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- Kingman v. KingmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1909
3Cited by6 opinions
- Matlock v. MatlockOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Sellers v. SellersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Martin v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Sherman v. ShermanOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Nielsen v. NielsenDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.