Legal Opinion

State v. Murphy

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 25, 2017No. Docket: Fra-16-559PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶'1] Carol Ann Murphy acquires animals and then is unable or unwilling to properly care for them. She has been twice convicted of cruelty to animals. She has been ordered never to possess animals again. Notwithstanding that order, when released from the four-year prison sentence imposed after her second conviction for cruelty to animals and other crimes, see State v. Murphy, 2010 ME 140, 10 A.3d 697, she returned to acquiring a variety of animals, including dogs, cats, chinchillas, rabbits, and a potbellied pig. Following a jury verdict finding her in contempt of court, see 4 M.R.S. § 114…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. MurphySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  2. State of Maine v. Seth J. HillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  3. State of Maine v. Daniel H. PelletierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  4. State v. St. OngeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RupertSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  2. State v. RupertSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  3. State v. RupertSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API