State v. Rupert
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtHjelm, J.
[¶ 1] After a nonjury trial held in the District Court (Portland, Kelly, C.J.), Benjamin J. Rupert was adjudicated of having committed two traffic infractions. Rupert appeals, arguing that the court erred by denying a motion in which he asserted a purported “right” to be represented in this matter by a person who is not licensed to practice law in Maine. Because no such right exists—and because, in fact, that third-party representation would have constituted the unauthorized practice of law, which is a crime—the court correctly denied the motion, and we affirm the judgment.
[¶ 2] In July 2016,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Indiana v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Eleazar Herrera-Venegas v. Felipe Benicio Sanchez-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- State v. HoflandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- Tri-State Rubbish, Inc. v. Town of New GloucesterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.