Legal Opinion

State v. Rupert

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 17, 2017No. Docket: Cum-16-523Published

1Opinion of the CourtHjelm, J.

[¶ 1] After a nonjury trial held in the District Court (Portland, Kelly, C.J.), Benjamin J. Rupert was adjudicated of having committed two traffic infractions. Rupert appeals, arguing that the court erred by denying a motion in which he asserted a purported “right” to be represented in this matter by a person who is not licensed to practice law in Maine. Because no such right exists—and because, in fact, that third-party representation would have constituted the unauthorized practice of law, which is a crime—the court correctly denied the motion, and we affirm the judgment.

[¶ 2] In July 2016,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Indiana v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Eleazar Herrera-Venegas v. Felipe Benicio Sanchez-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  4. State v. HoflandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  5. Tri-State Rubbish, Inc. v. Town of New GloucesterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API