Legal Opinion

Worley v. Giuliani

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 17, 2001No. 00-9126PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

AFTER ARGUMENT AND UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Plaintiffs-Appellants Cynthia Nibbelink Worley and Haja Worley (collectively the “Worleys”), pro se, appeal from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (John E. Sprizzo, Judge), dismissing their complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). The Worleys filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and State Environmental *133Quality Review Act/New York City Environmental Quality Review (“SEQRA/CEQR”)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. United States v. Cambio Exacto, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  4. Etuk v. SlatteryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  5. New York City Environmental Justice Alliance v. GiulianiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jones v. SchneidermanDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API