Jones v. Schneiderman
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
KIMBA M. WOOD, District Judge:
After extensive discovery, Plaintiffs and Defendants have cross-filed motions for summary judgment on Plaintiffs’ as-applied void-for-vagueness challenges to New York’s combative sport ban, N.Y. Unconsolidated Laws § 8905-a (the “Ban”), and a related restriction on liquor licensees, N.Y. Alcohol & Beverage Control Law § 106(6-c)(a) (the “Liquor Law”). For the reasons that follow, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion and GRANTS Defendants’ motion as to all remaining claims.1
1. Background
The factual background of this case is explained at length in…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Summers v. Earth Island InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cayuga Nation v. TannerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence v. BrownbackDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2015
- Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc. v. WheelerDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Avitabile v. BeachDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2017
- Nation v. TannerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.