Legal Opinion

S & S Oil, Inc. v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 25, 2012No. 122PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.

We are asked to consider whether the trial court committed reversible error by denying Petitioner’s request to include on the special verdict sheet a question specifically addressing the assumption of the risk defense. Petitioner contends that by denying the requested question, the trial court prevented the jury from considering whether Respondent assumed the risk of her injuries and committed reversible error. We hold that under the facts of this case: (1) the intermediate appellate court was incorrect in concluding that assumption of the risk and contributory negligence were “substantially…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Fraidin v. WeitzmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. FlippoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  4. Schroyer v. McNealCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  5. Poole v. Coakley & Williams Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2011

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Amer. Radiology v. ReissCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  2. Giant of Md. v. WebbCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  3. Steamfitters Local Union No. 602 v. Erie Ins. Exch.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  4. Reiss v. Am. Radiology Servs., LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  5. Reiss v. American RadiologyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API