Legal Opinion
United States v. Khan
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided July 12, 2004No. 1:03-cr-00127PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, Chief Judge.
Defendant Imran Khan moves to suppress inculpatory statements under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments. A hearing began on April 9, 2004, and continued twice, to May 27, and to June 28, 2004. The government opposes the motion. Having the benefit of the parties’ briefs, evidence presented during the hearing, and oral argument, I grant the motion in part and deny it in part.
I. Facts
A. Interviews with Other Defendants
The charges in this case arise from Defendant Khan’s and the other alleged co-conspirator defendants’ (see United States District Court…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Davila v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- United States v. Pacheco-AlvarezDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016
- Jose V.P.R. v. Sheriff of Freeborn County, Minnesota; Warden of the Freeborn County Adult Detention Center; Secretary of Homeland Security; Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement; Attorney General of the United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2026