Legal Opinion

Lanoue v. Rutland Renovations

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 10, 2008No. 06-378PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Roger Lanoue appeals from a Grand Isle Superior Court judgment ordering that bail monies Lanoue remitted to the Grand Isle Small Claims Court be released to Rutland Renovations in satisfaction of a small claims judgment. Because Lanoue’s appeal to this Court is untimely, we dismiss it.

¶ 2. The relevant facts are as follows. In July 2003, Lanoue filed suit against Rutland Renovations in small claims court. Shortly thereafter, Rutland Renovations filed a counterclaim. In January 2004, the small claims court entered judgment for Rutland Renovations in the amount of $3,025 ($3,000 in damages…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Baker v. Town of GoshenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  3. Putnam v. PutnamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  4. Dowlings, Inc. v. MayoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Webb v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  2. Lanoue v. Rutland RenovationsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API