Lanoue v. Rutland Renovations
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. Roger Lanoue appeals from a Grand Isle Superior Court judgment ordering that bail monies Lanoue remitted to the Grand Isle Small Claims Court be released to Rutland Renovations in satisfaction of a small claims judgment. Because Lanoue’s appeal to this Court is untimely, we dismiss it.
¶ 2. The relevant facts are as follows. In July 2003, Lanoue filed suit against Rutland Renovations in small claims court. Shortly thereafter, Rutland Renovations filed a counterclaim. In January 2004, the small claims court entered judgment for Rutland Renovations in the amount of $3,025 ($3,000 in damages…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Baker v. Town of GoshenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Putnam v. PutnamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- Dowlings, Inc. v. MayoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
3Cited by2 opinions
- Webb v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- Lanoue v. Rutland RenovationsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008