Legal Opinion

In re Daniel

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided October 4, 1929No. 2125PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGakRett, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming the action of the examiner in rejecting claims 1, 2, and 3 of applicant, and also rejecting claim 4 which was admitted for purpose of appeal by the board and rejected in its decision.

The subject matter of the application is a claimed device or mechanism for improved curtain-shade rollers, and the claims involved in this appeal are as follows:

1. The combination with a curtain-shade roller and a curtain shade and cord, said shade and cord secured to and adapted to wind on the roller in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brill v. Third Ave. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1900
  2. Edison Electric Light Co. v. Novelty Incandescent Lamp Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909
  3. United States v. HydeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Washington · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re BagerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API