Legal Opinion
In Re Bager
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided March 25, 1931No. Patent Appeal 2635PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LENROOT, Associate Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision 'of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming a decision of the Examiner, rejecting all of the claims of appellants, nine in number. Claim 5 of the application is illustrative of the claims in issue, and reads as follows:
“5. In a power shovel, the combination of a boom, a dipper-handle capable of swinging movement in a substantially vertical plane, a dipper supported by the handle, a padlock-sheave for hoisting the dipper and located behind the rear wall of the dipper and entirely below the upper edge of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- A. R. Mosler & Co. v. LurieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
- Jockmus v. LevitonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Munising Paper Co. v. American Sulphite Pulp Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- Brill v. Third Ave. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1900
- Edison Electric Light Co. v. Novelty Incandescent Lamp Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Universal Athletic Sales Co., a Corporation v. American Gym, Recreational & Athletic Equipment Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Bourns, Inc. v. Dale Electronics Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1969
- Des Rosiers v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
- In re MrazCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Application of Dorris E. SpearsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.