Legal Opinion

Bibb v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1887PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery City Court. Tried before tbe Hon. T. M. Arrington. Tbe court erred in charging tbe jury that if they found tbe defendant guilty they must assess a fine,” &c., § 4453 of Code of 1876; § 4500, Code of 1886; McPherson v. The State, 54 Ala. 225.

1Opinion of the CourtClopton, J.

Tbe defendant was indicted under section 4208 of Code of 1876, wbicb provides: “Any person who keeps, exhibits, or is interested or concerned in keeping or exhibiting any table for gaming, of whatsoever name, kind or description, not regularly licensed under tbe laws of this State, must, on conviction, be fined not' less than one hundred nor more than one thousand dollars; and may also be imprisoned in tbe county jail, or sentenced to bard labor for the county for not more than twelve months.” Tbe statute is aimed at tbe use to wbicb tbe table is appropriated. Any table used for gaming,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McPherson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  3. Wren v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  4. Toney v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CorbettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. State v. HenaghanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. State v. SandersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  4. Patton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Pinkerton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API