Legal Opinion

Aspen American Insurance v. Crowe

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided December 10, 2013No. MICV201300167Published

1Opinion of the Court

Salinger, Kenneth W., J.

Aspen American Insurance argues for the first time in a postjudgment motion for reconsideration that it had a constitutional right to have a jury assess damages after Thomas Crowe was defaulted for not answering the complaint. This motion is unavailing. Aspen had no such right to a jury. But even if it did, Aspen would have waived that right when it chose to proceed with a non-juiy damages assessment hearing. A party cannot agree to try a matter to a judge and then demand a do-over before a jury if its evidence does not persuade the court.

Final judgment awarding Aspen…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nishimatsu Construction Co., Ltd. v. Houston National Bank, Defendant-Third Party v. Jack D. Baize, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  2. Productora E Importadora De Papel v. FlemingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Doherty v. Retirement Board of MedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  4. Henderson v. D'ANNOLFO DODGE ELECTRICAL CONTRMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  5. Freeman v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API