Aspen American Insurance v. Crowe
Massachusetts Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
Salinger, Kenneth W., J.
Aspen American Insurance argues for the first time in a postjudgment motion for reconsideration that it had a constitutional right to have a jury assess damages after Thomas Crowe was defaulted for not answering the complaint. This motion is unavailing. Aspen had no such right to a jury. But even if it did, Aspen would have waived that right when it chose to proceed with a non-juiy damages assessment hearing. A party cannot agree to try a matter to a judge and then demand a do-over before a jury if its evidence does not persuade the court.
Final judgment awarding Aspen…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nishimatsu Construction Co., Ltd. v. Houston National Bank, Defendant-Third Party v. Jack D. Baize, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Productora E Importadora De Papel v. FlemingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Doherty v. Retirement Board of MedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Henderson v. D'ANNOLFO DODGE ELECTRICAL CONTRMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Freeman v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.