Hawkins v. Snellings
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Justice.
It is well settled law that a “mortgagor in possession may without previous tender file bill to protect and enforce equity of redemption” and that a “mortgagee cannot, pending mortgagor’s bill to protect equity of redemption, impair mortgagor’s right to redeem.” Ezzell v. First Nat. Bank of Russellville, 218 Ala. 462, 119 So. 2; Boyd v. Dent, 216 Ala. 171, 113 So. 11; Carroll v. Henderson, 191 Ala. 248, 68 So. 1; Thompson v. Atchley, 201 Ala. 398, 78 So. 196, 79 So. 478; Fair v. Cummings, 197 Ala. 131, 72 So. 389; Burns v. Mortgage Bond Co. of New York, 199 Ala. 77, 73 So. 987.
O…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Prout v. HogeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Carter v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Hunter-Benn Co. Company v. Bassett Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Baisden v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Carroll v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Fairhope v. Town of DaphneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. OwensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Cunningham v. AndressSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Atkinson v. KirbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Hawkins v. SnellingsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.