Legal Opinion

United States v. Abuhouran

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 26, 2002No. Criminal Action No. 95-560-1. Civil Action No. 00-733Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POLLAK, District Judge.

In this § 2255 habeas action, Hitham Abuhouran (a/k/a Steve Honran), acting pro se, has raised five challenges to the 188-month sentence imposed upon him after he pled guilty in 1996 to, among other charges, four counts of money laundering and fifteen counts of bank fraud. The five points Mr. Abuhouran raises are as follows: (1) the indictment impermissibly relies upon a single transaction as the basis for charges of both bank fraud and money laundering; (2) assistance of counsel was ineffective because of the failure to raise point 1; (3) one of the counts in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API