Legal Opinion

Schwitzerlet-Seigler Co. v. Citizens & Southern Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 7, 1923No. 3565PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

Under the terms of the deed of assignment made by the maker of the notes sued on, the acceptance by the plaintiff of any benefits thereunder was a full satisfaction of these notes; and as the plaintiff did receive a benefit under the assignment, in the shape of a payment by the assignee on these notes, the acceptance of such benefit terminated the liability of the maker on these notes, which thereby, under the terms of the deed of assignment, became fully satisfied. A creditor can not both affirm and disaffirm the assignment, and when he once affirms it he…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thornton v. WynnSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Phillips v. SolomonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
  3. Brown v. AyerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1858
  4. Patterson v. GibsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  5. Cason v. HeathSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Axess International, Ltd. v. Intercargo Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. Peerless Casualty Company v. Housing Authority of the City of Hazelhurst, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  3. Hendricks v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  4. Parker v. PuckettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  5. The Hardaway Company, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Amwest Surety Insurance Company, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API