Legal Opinion
Axess International, Ltd. v. Intercargo Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 29, 1999No. 98-35133PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCON, Circuit Judge:
Intercargo Insurance Company (“Inter-cargo”) appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Axess International, Ltd. (“Axess”). In-tercargo issued a $50,000 surety bond to Max Bright Services, Ltd. (“Max Bright”), a non-vessel-operating common carrier which breached its contract with Axess to transport goods from Hong Kong to Long Beach, California. Intercargo contends that it is not liable on the bond because (1) Axess’s release of its claims against Max Bright operates as a release of its claims against Intercargo, and (2) the Hong Kong…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- California ex rel. Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- In Re JetBlue Airways Corp. Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Charles Von Bernuth v. John HerklotzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Axess Intern. Ltd. v. Intercargo Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Axess International Ltd. v. Intercargo InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.