Legal Opinion
People v. Faulkner
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided June 5, 1979No. Docket 78-1847PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtD. F. Walsh, J.
Defendant, Danny Faulkner, was convicted by a jury of larceny of property having a value over $100, MCL 750.356; MSA 28.588. He was also found guilty of being an habitual offender —fourth offense, and was sentenced to a prison term of 7 to 30 years. The sole issue raised on appeal concerns the admissibility of a statement made by defendant. Defendant was not given his Miranda advice before the questioning began which gave rise to his statement. Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436; 86 S Ct 1602; 16 L Ed 2d 694 (1966).
On the day of the alleged offense defendant was a resident at the New Way In in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- People v. BrannanMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. OmellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- People v. HardenbrookMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Arthur v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
- People v. ElliottMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
- Whitfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Grand Rapids v. ImpensMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Shatzer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.