Kimberly D. Blankenship v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE1
Kimberly D. Blankenship appeals her convictions for unlawful possession of a syringe, as a Class D felony, and maintaining a common nuisance, a Class D felony. Blankenship raises a single issue for our review, which we restate as whether the trial court abused its discretion when it admitted into evidence contraband found in Blankenship’s hotel room that the police seized pursuant to a search warrant. We hold that the officers’ reliance on the search warrant was objectively reasonable under Article 1, Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution and, as…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Litchfield v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Myers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. SpillersIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Hopkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Newby v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Larry Marshall v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Ricky Hill v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Samtwan Hobby v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020