Legal Opinion
Agredano v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 17, 2010No. 19-1991PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge MAYER. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge DYK.
MAYER, Circuit Judge.
The United States appeals the judgment of the Court of Federal Claims holding that United States Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) breached an implied-in-fact warranty when it inadvertently sold a vehicle containing concealed narcotics to Francisco Javier Rivera Agre-dano. See Agredano v. United States, 82 Fed.Cl. 416 (2008). Because the court erred in finding an implied warranty in the agreement between Customs and Agredano, we reverse.
BACKGROUND
Agredano attended a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sosa v. Alvarez-MachainSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Indiana Michigan Power Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- D & N Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Todd Construction, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Todd Construction, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- BLR Group of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.