Legal Opinion

Renaud v. Pageot

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1894PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error to "Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Appeal from the probate of a will. Proponents bring -error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The will of Julius Lefevre was congested on the two grounds of mental incapacity and undue influence. At the close of the testimony the circuit judge withdrew the latter question from the jury. The jury found against the will on the ground of mental incapacity, .and the proponents appeal.

1. It is contended that there was no such evidence of mental incapacity as warranted the court in submitting the case to the jury. No good purpose would be served by setting out the testimony at length, but a careful ex.amination of the record convinces us that there was sufficient evidence to justify the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fraser v. JennisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Prentis v. BatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. O'Connor v. MadisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sheehan v. KearneyMississippi Supreme Court · 1903
  2. In Re Estate of ForsytheSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. Fothergill v. FothergillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. Cooper v. HarlowMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Ganun v. GanunMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API