Smith v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Ruffin, Judge.
A Liberty County jury found Roy Smith guilty of five counts of possession of a vehicle with an altered vehicle identification number (VIN). On appeal, Smith contends that the trial court erred in admitting a computerized printout in violation of the best evidence rule and in admitting evidence of his character. Smith also asserts that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. We find that Smith’s contentions lack merit and affirm.
*5171. Smith contends that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence four computer printouts that listed the make, model, VIN, and owner of four…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Henson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Watson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Tipton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Christian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Mordica v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Rocha v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Billy Wayne Christian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Jeffery Mordica v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012