Legal Opinion

French Import Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 28, 1917No. 1736PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 39769.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Foxtail, rope, tombac, and snake chain, wound on reels in 100-meter lengths, and worth less than 30 cents a yard, was classified by the collector of customs at Providence, R. I., as materials of metal suitable for use in the manufacture of jewelry. The goods were accordingly assessed for duty at 50 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 356 of the tariff act of 1913, which paragraph, in so far as pertinent, reads as follows:

356. Jewelry, commonly or commercially so known, valued above 20 cents per dozen pieces, 60 per centum ad valorem; rope, curb, cable, and fancy patterns of chain not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Magone v. WiedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Cadwalader v. WanamakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Lorsch & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  2. Durbrow v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  3. Jordan Hardware Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1938
  4. United States v. Geo. S. Bush & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API