Legal Opinion

Durbrow v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 19, 1924No. 2338PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

The merchandise involved in this appeal consists of brass chain, imported in hanks 25 meters in length.

It is described by the appraiser as “shot or ball chain in long lengths,” and assessed for duty by the collector at 50 per cent ad valorem, as material of metal used in the manufacture of jewelry, under paragraph 356 of the tariff act of 1913, which reads as follows:

356. Jewelry, commonly or commercially so known, valued above 20 cents per dozen pieces, 60 per centum ad valorem; rope, curb, cable, and fancy patterns of chain not exceeding one-half inch in diameter, width, or thickness,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dingelstedt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
  2. United States v. DowningSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. French Import Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Coro, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  2. Protest 112861-K of West Coast Trading Co.United States Customs Court · 1946
  3. Protests 971722-G of Great Eastern Packing & Paper Stock Corp.United States Customs Court · 1942
  4. United States v. BernardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  5. United States v. Coro, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API