Silberman v. Silberman
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By HURD, PJ.:
This is an appeal on questions of law from a final order of the court of common pleas sustaining a motion to quash service of summons by publication upon two individual defendants wno are residents of Michigan. There are three other in dividual defendants residents of Ohio and two corporate defendants, The Shaw Warehouse Company and The Shaw Holding Company, both domiciled in Ohio with their principal places of business in the City of Cleveland.
Plaintiff, in his petition, alleges in substance that he had in his possession the sum of approximately $45,000.00 being the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jellenik v. Huron Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Illinois Central R. R. Co. v. OswaldIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
- Thompson v. Terminal Shares, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- Hook v. HoffmanArizona Supreme Court · 1915
- Andrews v. Guayaquil & Quito Railway Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.