Legal Opinion
Derish v. San Mateo-Burlingame Board Of Realtors
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 23, 1983No. 83-1791PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
724 F.2d 1347
1984-1 Trade Cases 65,771
Joel and Patty DERISH, Plaintiffs-Respondents,
v.
SAN MATEO-BURLINGAME BOARD OF REALTORS, California
Association of Realtors, National Association of
Realtors, H. Kent Atwater, Defendants-Petitioners.
No. 83-1791.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Oct. 12, 1983.
Decided Dec. 23, 1983.
Moses Lasky, Lasky, Haas, Cohler & Munter, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-petitioners.
David Barry, Barry & Finley, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs-respondents.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Adrian C. Eichman v. Fotomat Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Cox v. Summa Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Palm Springs Medical Clinic, Inc. v. Desert HospitalDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1986
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Adrian C. Eichman v. Fotomat Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985