Legal Opinion

McClinton v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 2003No. 92-CF-938, 01-CO-681PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REID, Associate Judge:

The central issue in this appeal is whether the trial court violated appellant Larry J. MeClinton’s Sixth Amendment constitutional right to counsel by permitting him, more than halfway through his trial, to represent himself, with the assistance of standby counsel, without making a proper inquiry on the record as to whether appellant’s waiver of counsel was knowing, intelligent and voluntary. We hold that on the whole record before us, the trial court erred by not conducting an adequate inquiry with regard to Mr. McClinton’s waiver of his right to counsel. However, since…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tinsley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Bell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. McIntosh v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Hill v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Tillman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API