Legal Opinion

Tillman v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 2013No. 12-CF-14PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FARRELL, Senior Judge:

“There can be no blinking the fact that the right of an accused to conduct his own defense seems to cut against the grain of [the Supreme] Court’s decisions holding that the Constitution requires that no accused can be convicted and imprisoned unless he has been accorded the right to the assistance of counsel.” Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 832, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975). Recently, the Supreme Court again recognized the “tension in these two principles,” Marshall v. Rodgers, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 1446, 1449, 185 L.Ed.2d 540, 544 (2013), one strong enough…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Marshall v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Hsu v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tillman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API