Ex Parte King
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
We granted the writ of certiorari to take a closer look at the petitioners' argument that the "trial court erred in consolidating the defendants' cases for trial in the absence of the defendant, Joey King." In support of their argument, the petitioners seize upon the last sentence found in Rule 15.4(b), Temporary Alabama Rules of Criminal Procedure. That rule provides as follows:
"(b) Consolidation. If defendants are charged in separate indictments, informations, or complaints, the court, on its own initiative or on motion of any party, may, no later than seven (7) days prior to trial, order…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976
- Ex Parte StoutSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Stout v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
- Ex Parte JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Burton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- Ex Parte BurtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- DeBruce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- Ex Parte DeBruceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.