Pugh v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HARPER, Judge.
Appellant was indicted, charged with murder, and convicted of murder in the second degree, and his punishment assessed at five years confinement in the State penitentiary.
In appellant’s first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, twenty-first, twenty-second, and twenty-third assignments of error is presented the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict, in some of them it being alleged that the evidence is insufficient to sus tain the verdict, and in others that the verdict is contrary to the law as given in charge to the jury. Appellant groups them in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kidwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Darter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Mayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
- Reyons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
- McCandless v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
3Cited by5 opinions
- Patterson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Young v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- Escamilla v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Keeton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937
- United States v. YoungDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1939