Legal Opinion

United States v. Young

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided January 26, 1939No. 2906Published

1Opinion of the Court

McMILLAN, District Judge.

The defendant is here being tried for the murder of a revenue agent. It is not claimed that he did the actual killing, but the contention is that he was a principal to it because he aided and abetted in it and caused it to be brought about. The killing was actually done by one Pete Martinez, who, it is claimed, was stationed as a guard at an illicit still. Martinez was also killed.

Accordingly, we have here a double shooting, in which both of the parties to the combat are dead. The only living witness to the duel is Hucel Hamilton, a young boy who is now here present…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Young v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  2. Fournier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
  3. Litsinger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930
  4. Hirschfeld v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
  5. Pugh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API